It is a common scenario in Italy: in 2009, a metal fabrication company hired a sales representative under an “occasional business broker” (procacciatore d’affari) agreement. The arrangement continued for a couple of years before being formalized into a standard Sales Agency Contract (contratto di agenzia). Eventually, the relationship soured, and the company abruptly terminated the rep in November 2013. The agent filed a lawsuit, leading to a legal battle recently resolved by the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation, Order No. 131448 of May 7, 2026). This ruling is highly relevant because it clarifies critical aspects of managing commercial networks under Italian employment and commercial law.

1) Broker or Agent? How Stability Redefines the Contract

a. As mentioned, the representative was initially classified as an occasional broker. The reasoning is clear: under Italian law, a broker—unlike a formal sales agent—cannot claim mandatory minimum notice periods for termination, nor are they entitled to final end-of-service indemnities (indennità di fine rapporto). The company likely assumed a “lighter” contract structure would be beneficial, at least during an initial trial phase. Indeed, it is not uncommon for Italian businesses to use a broker agreement as a stepping stone before committing to a full agency contract.

b. However, Italian courts look past written contracts, labels, or how payments are categorized on invoices. Instead, judges focus heavily on the actual reality of the day-to-day operations. In this case, no written agreement even existed during the initial “brokerage” period. Yet, there was clear evidence of regular monthly payments. Furthermore, once the rep officially became an “agent,” their operational duties remained completely unchanged. Based on this continuity, the court ruled that the relationship possessed permanent stability from day one and must be legally treated as an agency contract from the very beginning.

The Supreme Court reaffirmed its established precedent (citing recent rulings No. 1263/2025 and No. 1253/2026), stating:

“The defining characteristics of a sales agency contract are the agent’s obligation to carry out a continuous and stable activity to promote the conclusion of contracts on behalf of the principal within a specific territory. This creates a non-episodic, independent professional collaboration where the agent carries their own business risk and must follow the principal’s instructions. In contrast, occasional brokerage consists of a more limited activity where an individual, solely on their own initiative and without any stability, occasionally collects customer orders. Consequently, if a broker relationship is disputed, the burden of proof lies not on a contract, but on the factual evidence of sporadic intermediation for each individual transaction.”

2) Must a Sales Agent Close the Deal, or is Referral Enough?

a. One of the manufacturing company’s main defenses was that the rep could not be deemed a true sales agent because they merely identified and referred leads, while the final contract negotiations and closures were handled directly by the company.

b. The Supreme Court firmly rejected this argument. Under Italian Civil Code (Art. 1742 c.c.), an agent’s core duty is simply to promote the business and foster sales. Consequently, it is legally unnecessary for the agent to participate in final negotiations or sign the final agreement for a commission to be rightfully earned.

3) Paying a Fixed Monthly Fee to an Agent: What Are the Risks?

a. Over the years, the company paid the agent a fixed monthly fee that exceeded the actual commissions earned during those periods. When the relationship dissolved, the company demanded a full refund of these excess balances.

b. The court ruled against the company. Evidence showed that during the entire multi-year relationship, the principal never once asked the agent to return the difference between the fixed monthly allowance and the lower commissions earned. For the judges, this continuous practice proved that the company implicitly treated the fixed fee as a guaranteed minimum compensation rather than an advance.


Key Takeaways for International Businesses in Italy

While this ruling aligns with existing Italian legal trends, it offers three vital practical lessons for managing a commercial sales network in Italy without facing expensive lawsuits:

  • Occasional Broker or Permanent Agent? Mind the Stability. Broker agreements must be reserved exclusively for truly temporary, sporadic freelance lookouts who have zero ongoing obligations. If a representative is integrated into your weekly operations or expects regular pay, do not disguise this as a broker arrangement or an unofficial trial period. Draft a proper agency contract immediately, and include a formal legal probation clause if necessary.
  • Agent Duties and Extra Administrative Tasks. In Italy, an agent is anyone paid to steadily promote your business. You can add extra responsibilities to their contract, such as power of attorney to sign deals, debt collection (riscossione crediti), inventory management, or customer service. However, you must explicitly state in the contract whether these extra tasks are covered by standard commissions or if they require independent compensation.
  • Fixed Salaries and Commission Advances: Put It in Writing. Agents are typically paid via percentage-based commissions. Providing a pure fixed salary is highly discouraged in Italy, as courts may reclassify the agent as a full employee, triggering massive back-taxes and benefits. However, giving a fixed “advance on commissions” is common to support new agents during onboarding. To protect your business, you must:
    • Explicitly state in the contract if these payments are recoverable advances (meaning the agent must pay back the deficit if sales targets are missed) or guaranteed minimums (non-refundable).
    • Set a strict, explicit **expiration date** for these advances. Without a clear time limit, the fixed fee will likely be viewed as a permanent acquired right by Italian labor courts.

Those who are interested in receiving a free copy of the annotated materials, please write to newsletter@lexmill.com.

<img src="" class="rounded-circle shadow border border-white border-width-4 me-3" width="60" height="60" alt="Carlo Mosca">
Author: Carlo Mosca

A lawyer specializing in international commercial transactions. Lexmill's founding partner.